A Multidimensional Framework for Understanding Tax Audit Effectiveness in Developing Countries
Keywords:Tax audit, developing countries, audit probability, detection, sanction
Taxation in developing countries is different from the practice in advanced countries. There is, therefore, the need to contextualize tax research in developing countries. One of the significant differences between the two regions is the practice of tax audits. In advanced countries, the probability of tax audit is seen as a deterrence to tax noncompliance. However, this study argues that this may not be the case in developing countries. The paper presents tax audits in developing countries as a three-dimensional process consisting of audit probability, detection and sanction. The paper argues that these three aspects are distinct and must all work together to ensure an effective audit. For instance, after an audit, there is a need for detection to take place. Otherwise, the entire process will be ineffective. Furthermore, after detection, there is a need for sanction before the audit process can serve as a deterrent. Detection without sanction renders the entire process ineffective. In developing countries, audits can take place without detection and detection may occur without any sanction because tax evaders can compromise the system through bribery and corruption. The paper makes a significant contribution both to the literature and practice. There is a need for researchers to focus on the three dimensions of tax audit in developing countries rather than a holistic audit probability, as found in some studies from advanced countries. Additionally, practitioners should measure tax audit effectiveness based on the three dimensions proposed in this study.
Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion, a theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1(1972), 323-338.
Alm, J. (2012). Measuring, explaining, and controlling tax evasion: Lessons from theory, experiments and field studies. Tulane Economics Working Papers Series, 1213.
Alm, J., & Mckee, M. (2006). Audit certainty, audit productivity and tax compliance. National Tax Journal, LIX(4) 801-816.
Alm, J., Jackson, B., & Mckee, M. (1992). Estimating the determinants of taxpayer compliance with experimental data. National Tax Journal, 45(1), 107-114.
Alm, J., Sanchez, I., & Dejuan, A. (1995). Economic and noneconomic factors in tax compliance. Kyklos, 48(1), 3-18.
Andreoni. J., Erard, B. & Feinstein, J. (1998). Tax compliance. Journal of Economic Literature, 32(2), 816-880
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 383-405.
Bes, M. (2007). Argentina in Bernandi, L, barrier, A., Marenzi, A., & Profeta, P. (2007) Eds. Tax systems and Tax reforms in Latin America, Societa, Italiana di Economica publica, Working Paper No 587
Besley, T., & Persson, T. (2014). Why do developing countries tax so little? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(4) 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.4.99
Bird, R.M. (2015). Improving tax administration in developing countries, Journal of Tax Administration, 1(1), 23-45.
Bobek, D. D., Hageman, A. M., & Kelliher, C. F. (2013). Analyzing the role of social norms in tax compliance behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 115, 451-468.
Bobek, D. D., Robert, R. W., & Sweeney, J. T. (2007). The social norms of tax compliance: Evidence from Australia, Singapore and the USA. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 49-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9219-X
Brown, R. E., & Manzur, M. J. (2003). IRS comprehensive approach to compliance measurement. National Tax Journal, 689-700. Retrieved from https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/mazur.pdf
Burgess, R., & Stern, N. (1993). Taxation and development. Journal of Economic Literature, 31(2), 762-830
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage publications.
Cobham, A. (2014). Nigeria’s upward revision of GDP should sound alarm on the tax-to-GDP ratio. Retrieved from https://www.cgdev.org/blog/nigerias-upward-revision-gdp-should-sound-alarm-tax-gdp-ratio
Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. Los Angeles: Sage publications
Dubin, J. A. (2007). Criminal investigation enforcement activities and taxpayer noncompliance. Public Finance Review, 35(4),500-529.
Elffers, H. (2000). But taxpayers do cooperate! in M. Van Vught, M, Snyder, T.R. Tyler, and Andres biel (eds), Cooperation in Modern society: Promoting the Welfare of Communities, States and Organizations, London: Routledge
Eriksen, K., & Fallan, L. (1996). Tax Knowledge and attitude towards taxation: A report on a quasi-experiment, Journal of Economic Psychology, 17(3), 387-408.
Everest-Phillips, M. (2010). State-building taxation for developing countries: Principles for reform. Development Policy Review, 28(1),75-96.
Fischer C. M, Wartick M., & Mark, M. (1992). Detection probability and taxpayer compliance: A review of the Literature. Journal of Accounting Literature, 11, I-46
Fjeldstad, O-H., & Heggstad, K. K. (2011). The tax systems in Mozambique, Tanzania and Zambia: Capacity and constraints. CMI Reports R 2011:3.
IMF (2013). Greece selected issues. IMF Country Report NO. 13/155
IMF (2015). Current challenges in revenue mobilization: Improving tax compliance. Washington: International Monetary Fund.
Johnson, R. A., Kast, F. E., & Rosenzweig, J. E. (1964). Systems theory and management. Management Science, 10(2), 367-384
Joshi, A., Prichard, W., & Heady, C. (2014). Taxing the informal economy: The current state of knowledge and agendas for future research, The Journal of Development Studies, 50(10), 1325-1347.
Kaldor, N. (1963). Will underdeveloped countries learn to tax? Council on foreign relations: Foreign Affairs, JAN, 1963.
Kangave, J., Nakato, S., Waiswa, R., & Zzimbe, P. L. (2016). Boosting Revenue collection through taxing high net worth individuals: The case of Uganda. ICTD working Paper NO. 2541.
Kirchler, E. (2007). The economic psychology of taxpayers behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCluskey, R. (2016). Why African governments should tax the rich. International Center for Tax and Development, International Center for Tax and Development.
McKerchar, M. & Evans, C. (2009). Sustaining growth in developing economies through improved taxpayer compliance: Challenges for policy makers and revenue authorities. Ejournal of Tax Research, 7(2), 171-201
OECD (2014). OECD Development co-operation peer reviews, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/23097132
OECD (2014b). Fragile States, 2014. Domestic revenue mobilization in fragile states. Retrieved from https://www.gfintegrity.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/OECD-Fragile-States-Report-2014.pdf
Okonjo-Iweala, N. (2014). In my view: Development depends on realizing the potential of taxation. OECD Insights. Retrieved from http://oecdinsights.org/2014/10/09/in-my-view-development-depends-on-realising-the-potential-of-taxation/
Ritsatos, T. (2014). Tax evasion and compliance, from the neoclassical paradigm to behavioural economics, a review. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 10(2), 244-262. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-07-2012-0059
Sabaini, J. C. G., & Jimenez, J. P. (2012). Tax structure and tax evasion. CEPAL macroeconomic del desarrolo No. 118
Slemrod, J., Blumenthal, M., & Christian, C. (2001). Taxpayer response to an increased probability of audit: Evidence from a controlled experiment in Minnesota. Journal of Public Economics, 79, 455-483.
Stinespring, J.R. (2011). Dynamic scoring, tax evasion and the shadow economy. Public Finance Review, 39(1), 50-74.
Torgler, B. (2002). Speaking to theorist and searching for facts: Tax morale and compliance in experiments, Journal of Economic Surveys, 16(5), 657-683.
UNECA (2015). Country Profile: Nigeria Retrieved from http://www.uneca.org/sites/default/files/uploaded-documents/CoM/com2015/cp_nigeria_country_profile.pdf
Wang, S., (2001). The construction of state extractive capacity. Modern China, 27(2), 229-261.
Wenzel, M. (2004). An analysis of norm processes in tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25, 213-228.
How to Cite
Copyright of all articles published in the Indian Pacific Journal of Accounting and Finance (IPJAF) belongs to their respective authors. Site users are permitted to download and print the articles for personal use. Further reproduction and/or distribution is not permitted, except for brief excerpts or quotations intended for inclusion in some other original works. In this case, proper attribution must be made to the author/copyright holder, and the place of publication must be acknowledged. Altering, editing or otherwise modifying the content of information obtained from the Indian Pacific Journal of Accounting and Finance (IPJAF) is a breach of copyright.
While you retain the copyright of your original material, by publishing in the Indian Pacific Journal of Accounting and Finance (IPJAF) , you will have agreed to the following contractual terms:
- The article is the original work of the stated author(s).
- The work has not been published previously.
- If the Article contains copyright material owned by others, written permission has been obtained from the copyright owner(s) to republish such material in any print or electronic medium and that you have included appropriate acknowledgement of such rights in the Article.
- The author agrees to grant a non-exclusive license to the Indian Pacific Journal of Accounting and Finance (IPJAF) to communicate the work to the public.
- The Indian Pacific Journal of Accounting and Finance (IPJAF) may use the article for publicity purposes.
- The Indian Pacific Journal of Accounting and Finance (IPJAF) may publish the article on third-party sites.
- Any subsequent publication of the article by the authors will carry the acknowledgement: First published in the Indian Pacific Journal of Accounting and Finance (IPJAF) [http://ipjaf.omjpalpha.com]
The Indian Pacific Journal of Accounting and Finance (IPJAF) has taken all reasonable measures to ensure that material contained in this website is the original work of the author(s). However, the Journal gives no warranty and accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or the completeness of the material; no reliance should be made by any user on the material. The user should check with the authors for confirmation.
Articles published in the Indian Pacific Journal of Accounting and Finance (IPJAF) do not represent the views held by the editors and members of the editorial board. Authors are responsible for all aspects of their articles except the editorial screen design.